Whoops! Missed this one. I think you've seen my rants before in this regard lol, but will re-type for folks watching this thread.
Appearance: I haven't seen a replacement bumper focused on deer damage that I love the looks of on an otherwise stock truck. My opinion, they vary from horrendous to mediocre, in no small part because of how much they angle up in front of the tires and stick out like a pouting bottom lip (other reasons, too). With the right changes elsewhere on the truck, they can look pretty good.
Functionality summary: Aftermarket deer bumpers appear to do the job of protecting from deer strikes quite well, but you need to be aware of and OK with increasing the risk of taking or dramatically changing another person's life in a collision. This includes collisions with pedestrians and other vehicles at speed. In the case of impacting another vehicle, that risk applies not only to everyone in the other vehicle, but everyone in your vehicle.
Let's get into the details of that summary.
None of the deer protection bumpers available for our trucks have been crash tested to ensure safety in a collision with another vehicle or a pedestrian.
I contacted Warn, Buckstop and Ranch Hand, and confirmed they don't do crash testing. For the ones I did not contact, they're smaller brands and if they did crash testing, you would think they would advertise it. ARB crash tests their bumpers, and advertises it, but they don't make one for the newer generation Super Duty's. If someone knows of an aftermarket bumper for our trucks that is crash tested
please let me know.
Maybe (
maybe!) in a high speed collision with a lighter vehicle you're more safe having an immovable bumper. But that's not guaranteed. Crumple zones exist for a reason: the vehicle absorbs the impact, not the occupants. In an impact with a similar weight or heavier vehicle I'm truly not convinced a solid bumper is good.
Even if we assume you're OK in your truck with a big bumper thanks to being heavier, that doesn't mean the person or family that's on the other side is OK. Reducing your crumple zone decreases safety on both sides of the collision.
As for pedestrians, I struggle to see how any bumper that protects against deer damage is anything but horrible for pedestrian safety. Vehicles designed for pedestrian safety focus on the bumper and hood being relatively soft to minimize leg and head injury, as well as prioritizing the pedestrian coming onto the hood so they don't go under the vehicle.
Bumpers focused on deer protection emphasize that they're unmovable and often have features to prevent deer from coming up on the hood. The exact opposite of pedestrian safety design.
Regardless of who's at fault (we all make mistakes), I want to minimize, not maximize, my contributions to ending or dramatically changing someone else's life.
I hear the arguments for needing deer protection, though.
People who live where there's so many deer that they will have multiple collisions per year. Assuming the driver is already driving defensively, then that deer bumper is critical in reducing truck downtime. That can make a huge difference in someone's ability to live and work. This is the strongest argument, by far. It is up to the individual to weigh the benefits of reducing that downtime with the increased risk of taking or severely damaging a life (including their own).
Another common argument is life safety. The bumper reduces the likelihood of the vehicle being disabled in bad weather or a remote location. This is a weak argument to me. There are a million and one ways a vehicle can leave you stranded that don't involve deer. If you're going somewhere that being stranded is a risk to life safety, don't get a new bumper, get supplies, equipment, and training to keep you alive and rescued (extra food and water, sleeping bag, satellite communications, etc). And slow down to decrease the likelihood of hitting a deer in the first place.