Fuel Pump recalls - 2020-2022 Models

Since people are asking how PCM changes effect the fuel pump. I found this a bit ago, yes it's NOT about the 6.7L but the aspects of the info can show what happens with PCM changes.

This is copied from GDE, it does pertain to all GEN3 ecodiesel engines and might be useful for some.

The CP4 Bosch fuel pump has been in the field since 2008 model year with European OEMs in both 1-plunger (CP4.1) and 2-pluger (CP4.2) configurations. It came to the US market in the 2011 model year used by the North American OEMs. Over the years there have been many failures of this pump due to the plunger rotating in the bore leading to the roller bearing grinding on the cam lobe and sending metal throughout the system. The design of the roller-bearing and cam lobe create inertial force on the plunger to keep it in the proper alignment and it should never rotate if the roller wheel and cam always stay in contact. However, there are situations internal to the pump when there is not enough downforce on the plunger to keep it in contact with the cam lobe. This is the core issue of why these pumps can fail.

Now, let’s discuss the internal operation of the pump. There are three operating modes: MPROP control, PCV control (bleed valve on high pressure fuel rail) and coupled pressure control (CPC). The MPROP is Bosch’s name for the fuel metering inlet valve, this controls how much fuel is delivered to the plunger chamber. During MPROP closed loop control, the PCV is over-closed and MPROP delivers the proper fueling to achieve desired pressure in the fuel rails. This method has been used since 2001 on the CP3 pump and is robust. When the accelerator is released the MPROP closes to decrease flow and the PCV opens momentarily to relieve excess rail pressure as the requested pressure is decreased.

The next mode of operation is PCV control. Here the MPROP is fully open and delivering max fuel to the pump plunger and the PCV regulates the fuel rail pressure in closed loop control by closing only enough to reach the desired rail pressure. The downside to this mode is that the high volume of fuel that is pumped into the rail and then recirculated out thru the PCV consumes a lot of power inside the pump and also generates a higher amount of heat. OEMs generally use the PCV-only control method when fuel temps are cold, in order to heat up the fuel faster. This control strategy is also employed on the CP3 and CP1/CP1H pumps.

On high power-density small displacement applications it is necessary to size the high-pressure pump to meet the fuel flow requirements at rated power. On applications with solenoid injectors there is an additional margin that must be included, due to the constant leakage from the injectors thru the backflow line. However, these small displacement engines have a very low fuel rate at idle which means just a very small flow of fuel thru the metering unit given that the fuel rate is low and also the rail pressure is at its lowest point when idling.

With consideration given to component tolerance, sometimes it is not possible to govern properly via metering-unit only control the rail pressure at idle or when coasting with a max tolerance part. This happens because the metering unit at its very first opening position flows more fuel than is necessary to meet the required demand. In the days of the Bosch EDC16 controller several OEMs would make a switch back to the PCV mode at very low fuel rates including coasting, to let the metering unit be open into a more controllable area.

With the EDC17 era was possible also a new mode called CPC (Coupled Pressure Control). This mode allows to prescribe a desired value for both the metering unit flow and also the rail pressure controlled via the PCV valve, leading both actuators to be under closed loop control via PID-governors (proportial, integral, and derivative components). The purpose of this is to allow the metering unit to operate in a more controllable flow rate but not pay the penalty of power consumption and heat rejection by full PCV mode. You can think of this mode as the PCV one but with lower flow rate thru the metering unit.

The OE calibrations for the EcoDiesel 2014 thru the present (both Gen2 and Gen3) all use this CPC mode as part of their calibration strategy. If you rev the engine while parked with the hood open, as the engine speed comes back to idle is very common to hear a prominent noise akin to gravel in a rock crusher or to an engine with solid lifter camshaft that has an incorrect valve lash. This noise happens as the metering unit flow is varied (via CPC algorithm) thru the pump and generally lasts for a number of seconds, sometimes going away and other times persisting indefinitely.

We surmise that during this transition period of flow rate that the noise is generated by a clearance that forms between the roller wheel and the pump’s camshaft. During normal operation (with the factory calibration), the pump operates in MPROP mode generally when under load but constant makes the transition to the CPC mode in light load and coasting situations. During that transition the MPROP has to make a large change in delivery almost instantaneously, leading to a loss of motion control within the valvetrain of the pump.

In all Green Diesel Engineering tuning we turn off CPC mode for EcoDiesel applications (GEN2 and GEN3). This seems to have significantly reduced potential for the plunger to lift off the cam lobe. Due to a persistent backflow from the solenoid injectors to the tank we find it is not necessary to use the PCV mode for fuel heating. Thanks to additional learning functions inside the software we find it is 100% reliable to run in metering-unit only control in 100% of operation. This eliminates the pump noise you hear in light/no-load transitory operation and offers the least amount of energy to drive pump which aids in fuel economy. Minimizing pressure disturbances internally in CP4 is the best method to maximize fuel pump life and minimize a catastrophic failure.

GDE tunes exhibit a much lower failure rate in the field. The only failures of the fuel system we have heard about entail putting gasoline in the fuel tank, putting DEF in the fuel tank, high water content in diesel fuel or running the system out of fuel (pump loses lubrication).
I was about to write the same exact thing! 🤪
 
Last edited:
Resurrecting this thread. My Ford Pass app now says there's a fix for this (maybe it's been there awhile and I never noticed). Has anyone taken theirs in? Am I late to the party and it was already discussed on another thread? View attachment 243451
I called to schedule mine but they said that Ford has paused this for right now....lol
 
Some other info from a random FB post :

24S78 recall - this is not a urgent recall, it doesnt affect how the truck drives, it doesnt automatically give you a fuel system replacement. It doesn't do anything for you if you have a DCR. It is a pcm update for the high pressure fuel pump. The pcm updates strategy to lower fuel pressure, faster bleed down time and overall pressure to match load demand. The recall also states if the truck has codes for low fuel pressure, (P0087, P008a), the dealer will inspect the fuel condition, check for pump failure and metal debris. This is a very hard issue to get covered under warranty. Ford asks for a lot of pictures, service records and scan tool data to make their decision. If they see any kind of rust or contaminates, or missing your fuel filter records, it will be denied. There are some that slip through but not the majority. If you have had a fuel system replacement and your truck falls under the recall, there is a chance you can be reimbursed providing that you have all your records and data from the diagnosis.
As of 2/3/26 we are having trouble with the PCM update, it will not generate a code for the dealers to verify the software update. We have stopped taking them in for the moment until Ford figures their shit out. Ive never seen a billion dollar company have so many problems with software.
 
I haven't heard anything back from the dealership since they told me they were having issues connecting to Ford. I'll try to remember to call them.
 
dealer has my 2022 6.7 for this recall for about a month. got approved and now cant finish due to update failure with no resolution.
 
I hope you are driving a very nice loaner truck!!!!!
 
dealer has my 2022 6.7 for this recall for about a month. got approved and now cant finish due to update failure with no resolution.
That's crazy! They did a truck before mine. When they went to do mine Ford had cut off access or something, so they said I could pickup my truck or wait. I waited til the end of the day, then picked it up the next when they still hadn't heard anything. Did yours get started then brick the computer or something? Or do they just not want to let it go?
 
That's crazy! They did a truck before mine. When they went to do mine Ford had cut off access or something, so they said I could pickup my truck or wait. I waited til the end of the day, then picked it up the next when they still hadn't heard anything. Did yours get started then brick the computer or something? Or do they just not want to let it go?
That's crazy! They did a truck before mine. When they went to do mine Ford had cut off access or something, so they said I could pickup my truck or wait. I waited til the end of the day, then picked it up the next when they still hadn't heard anything. Did yours get started then brick the computer or something? Or do they just not want to let it go?

That's crazy! They did a truck before mine. When they went to do mine Ford had cut off access or something, so they said I could pickup my truck or wait. I waited til the end of the day, then picked it up the next when they still hadn't heard anything. Did yours get started then brick the computer or something? Or do they just not want to let it go?
They got started and Ford put the recall on hold right before they got to reprogram the computer. Not sure what the next step is.
 
This is interesting:
2022 F350 Tune.
Ford has a table in there for 'Estimated High Pressure Fuel Pump Damage'. It's not populated in this particular strategy, but it's in there and scaled with mileage (KM).
 

Attachments

  • HPFP Damage.webp
    HPFP Damage.webp
    95.9 KB · Views: 20
This is interesting:
2022 F350 Tune.
Ford has a table in there for 'Estimated High Pressure Fuel Pump Damage'. It's not populated in this particular strategy, but it's in there and scaled with mileage (KM).
April Fool's! 🤪
 
Ford has had my truck since January and the recall was approved for a full fuel system replacement as of being of june. Not sure i even want it back once they are finished
that's awesome, i think it'lll be fine if they are
  1. a competant dealer (I say this bc my dad had to get FoMoCo involved due to incomp at a local dealer trying to do 3.5 ecoboost cam phasers) what a shit hole, I told him I wouldn't take my truck back there if it was for free wiper blades; they're about that incompetant.
  2. have a list of all documented parts repalcements. If they are flushing the tank, flushing rail lines, new lines under the hood, need rails, new valves/solenoids, new pump, new injectors, new filters.
 
Ford has had my truck since January and the recall was approved for a full fuel system replacement as of being of june. Not sure i even want it back once they are finished
Unacceptable. I've got a drawer full of recalls on my 22. Honestly, it seems like I get one every month. One of them a couple months ago said I could void my warranty if I don't respond and allow them to address it. I've yet to take it to the dealership for anything because I just know they'll have it forever, and they'll screw it up. For me the closest is Corwin in Reno... anybody have any experience or comments using them?
 
According to my service tech the Fuel Pump recall expected fix date has been pushed to July 7, 2026, and it shows as a software fix rather than a hardware replacement. Guess we shall see.
 
According to my service tech the Fuel Pump recall expected fix date has been pushed to July 7, 2026, and it shows as a software fix rather than a hardware replacement. Guess we shall see.
Well, shit. That does not sound promising at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom